home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
ftp.cs.arizona.edu
/
ftp.cs.arizona.edu.tar
/
ftp.cs.arizona.edu
/
icon
/
newsgrp
/
group03a.txt
/
000031_icon-group-sender_Tue Mar 11 08:21:29 2003.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
2003-12-22
|
1KB
Return-Path: <icon-group-sender>
Received: (from root@localhost)
by baskerville.CS.Arizona.EDU (8.11.1/8.11.1) id h2BFIWw17130
for icon-group-addresses; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 08:18:32 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <200303111518.h2BFIWw17130@baskerville.CS.Arizona.EDU>
To: Kazimir@chem.pmf.hr
Cc: icon-group@cs.arizona.edu
From: "Alexandre E. Kopilovitch" <aek@vib.usr.pu.ru>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 04:10:58 +0300 (MSK)
Subject: Re: Do you think Icon is good choice for me?
Errors-To: icon-group-errors@cs.arizona.edu
Status: RO
>core language is rock solid.
My impression is the same.
But at the same time, there are many "idioms", which implicitly constitute
experimental layer of the language.
So, while you do not take those idioms "for free", but give proper own
definition for each idiom you use (and then adhere to that definition),
you are safe. In other words, simply do not deviate from the standards for
mathematical texts - and Icon will be good for you.
Alexander Kopilovitch aek@vib.usr.pu.ru
Saint-Petersburg
Russia